Arao v. Policy Holders Life Insurance Association

22 P.2d 726, 132 Cal. App. 785, 1933 Cal. App. LEXIS 495
California Court of Appeal·Decided June 2, 1933·No. Docket No. 4787.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

[1] This case presents the same facts and the same questions of law that are presented in the case of Kiku Saito v. PolicyHolders Life Insurance Assn., this day decided by this court (ante, p. 412 [22 P.2d 724]), except as to the name of the plaintiff and the dates of the transactions involved; and, for like reasons as in that case given, the order denying a change of venue is affirmed.

Thompson, J., and Pullen, P.J., concurred. *Page 786

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Arao v. Policy Holders Life Insurance Association, 22 P.2d 726, 132 Cal. App. 785, 1933 Cal. App. LEXIS 495 (Cal. Ct. App. 1933).

22 P.2d 726 (Arao v. Policy Holders Life Insurance Association) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mahin v. Policy Holders Life Insurance Association
22 P.2d 726 (California Court of Appeal, 1933)
Mahin v. Policy Holders Life Insurance
132 Cal. App. 786 (California Court of Appeal, 1933)