Aranoff v. Aranoff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Aranoff v. Aranoff

256 A.D.2d 372, 682 N.Y.S.2d 622, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13451

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 14, 1998·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by foreign decree dated February 17, 1993, the defendant appeals from a Qualified Domestic Relations Order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rigler, J.), dated October 15, 1997, which, inter alia, directed his pension fund to pay the plaintiff 55% of all benefits payable under his annuity contracts as enforcement of his child support obligations.

Ordered that on the Court’s own motion, the appellant’s notice of appeal is treated as an application for leave to appeal from the Qualified Domestic Relations Order, and leave to appeal is granted {see, CPLR 5701 [c]); and it is further,

Ordered that the Qualified Domestic Relations Order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the defendant’s contentions, the Qualified Domestic Relations Order is valid {see, Internal Revenue Code [26 USC] § 414 [p]; Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 USC § 1056 [d]). Rosenblatt, J. P., Santucci, Friedmann and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by foreign decree dated February 17, 1993, the defendant appeals from a Qualified Domestic Relations Order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rigler, J.), dated October 15, 1997, which, inter alia, directed his pension fund to pay the plaintiff 55% of all benefits payable under his annuity contracts as enforcement of his child support obligations.

Ordered that on the Court’s own motion, the appellant’s notice of appeal is treated as an application for leave to appeal from the Qualified Domestic Relations Order, and leave to appeal is granted {see, CPLR 5701 [c]); and it is further,

Ordered that the Qualified Domestic Relations Order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the defendant’s contentions, the Qualified Domestic Relations Order is valid {see, Internal Revenue Code [26 USC] § 414 [p]; Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 USC § 1056 [d]). Rosenblatt, J. P., Santucci, Friedmann and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Aranoff v. Aranoff, 256 A.D.2d 372, 682 N.Y.S.2d 622, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13451 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

256 A.D.2d 372 (Aranoff v. Aranoff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related