Arango v. State
72 So. 3d 339, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 16987, 36 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2353
Opinion
We affirm James Arango’s conviction and sentence for organized fraud. But, as conceded by the State, we must reverse the restitution awards that were entered after Arango filed his notice of appeal, which divested the trial court of jurisdiction. See, e.g., Renfroe v. State, 20 So.3d 1027 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009). On remand, the court may revisit the issue of restitution.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Arango v. State, 72 So. 3d 339, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 16987, 36 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2353 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).
72 So. 3d 339 (Arango v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Renfroe v. State
20 So. 3d 1027 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)