Arango v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Arango v. State

72 So. 3d 339, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 16987, 36 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2353

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 26, 2011

DocketNo. 2D09-2005

StatusPublished

This text of 72 So. 3d 339 (Arango v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Arango v. State, 72 So. 3d 339, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 16987, 36 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2353 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

NORTHCUTT, Judge.

We affirm James Arango’s conviction and sentence for organized fraud. But, as conceded by the State, we must reverse the restitution awards that were entered after Arango filed his notice of appeal, which divested the trial court of jurisdiction. See, e.g., Renfroe v. State, 20 So.3d 1027 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009). On remand, the court may revisit the issue of restitution.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

LaROSE and CRENSHAW, JJ„ Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NORTHCUTT, Judge.

We affirm James Arango’s conviction and sentence for organized fraud. But, as conceded by the State, we must reverse the restitution awards that were entered after Arango filed his notice of appeal, which divested the trial court of jurisdiction. See, e.g., Renfroe v. State, 20 So.3d 1027 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009). On remand, the court may revisit the issue of restitution.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

LaROSE and CRENSHAW, JJ„ Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

72 So. 3d 339, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 16987, 36 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2353, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arango-v-state-fladistctapp-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack