Arakadie v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Arakadie v. People

398 P.2d 977, 156 Colo. 321

CourtSupreme Court of Colorado

DecidedFebruary 8, 1965

DocketNo. 21380

StatusPublished

This text of 398 P.2d 977 (Arakadie v. People) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Arakadie v. People, 398 P.2d 977, 156 Colo. 321 (Colo. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice McWilliams

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Arakadie pled guilty to the charge of conspiracy to commit robbery as defined in C.R.S. ’53, 40-7-36 and was thereafter sentenced to a term of from six to ten years [322]*322in the State Penitentiary. By writ of error Arakadie now seeks review of this judgment and sentence.

Rule 37(d) Colo. R. Crim. P. states that “[n]o writ of error on behalf of the defendant shall lie to a judgment based upon a plea of guilty . . . .” and hence this writ of error must be, and hereby is, dismissed.

Mr. Justice Moore not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice McWilliams

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Arakadie pled guilty to the charge of conspiracy to commit robbery as defined in C.R.S. ’53, 40-7-36 and was thereafter sentenced to a term of from six to ten years [322]*322in the State Penitentiary. By writ of error Arakadie now seeks review of this judgment and sentence.

Rule 37(d) Colo. R. Crim. P. states that “[n]o writ of error on behalf of the defendant shall lie to a judgment based upon a plea of guilty . . . .” and hence this writ of error must be, and hereby is, dismissed.

Mr. Justice Moore not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

398 P.2d 977, 156 Colo. 321, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arakadie-v-people-colo-1965.