Araiza v. State
268 S.W. 941, 99 Tex. Crim. 305, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 132
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 18, 1925·No. No. 9263.·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
The offense is burglary; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of two years.
The record is before us without statement of facts or bills of exception. The indictment appears regular. No fundamental error has been discovered or pointed out.
The judgment is affirmed.
, Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Araiza v. State, 268 S.W. 941, 99 Tex. Crim. 305, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 132 (Tex. 1925).
268 S.W. 941 (Araiza v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mayes v. State
819 S.W.2d 877 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1987)
Penn v. State
628 S.W.2d 179 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1982)
Walthall v. State
505 S.W.2d 898 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1974)
Hardin v. Estelle
365 F. Supp. 39 (W.D. Texas, 1973)
Ex Parte Slaton
484 S.W.2d 102 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1972)