Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Arafat v. Jhalil

Arafat v. Jhalil

105 So. 3d 601, 2013 WL 85433, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 320
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 9, 2013
DocketNo. 4D11-4722
StatusPublished

This text of 105 So. 3d 601 (Arafat v. Jhalil) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Arafat v. Jhalil, 105 So. 3d 601, 2013 WL 85433, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 320 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979) (“Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court’s judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory.”).

MAY, C.J., GROSS and GERBER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee
377 So. 2d 1150 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
105 So. 3d 601, 2013 WL 85433, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 320, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arafat-v-jhalil-fladistctapp-2013.