Aracely Marinelarena v. Merrick Garland
This text of 992 F.3d 1143 (Aracely Marinelarena v. Merrick Garland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ARACELY MARINELARENA, No. 14-72003 Petitioner, Agency No. v. A095-731-273
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney ORDER General, Respondent.
On Remand from the Supreme Court of the United States
Filed April 16, 2021
Before: Sidney R. Thomas, Chief Judge, and A. Wallace Tashima, Susan P. Graber, William A. Fletcher, Marsha S. Berzon, Johnnie B. Rawlinson, Jay S. Bybee, Milan D. Smith, Jr., Sandra S. Ikuta, Paul J. Watford and Michelle T. Friedland, Circuit Judges.
Order 2 MARINELARENA V. GARLAND
ORDER
The Supreme Court has remanded this case to the en banc court. See Wilkinson v. Marinelarena, 2021 WL 850613 (U.S. Mar. 8, 2021).
The case is further remanded to the three-judge panel “for further consideration in light of Pereida v. Wilkinson,” 141 S. Ct. 754 (Oct. 4, 2020).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
992 F.3d 1143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aracely-marinelarena-v-merrick-garland-ca9-2021.