Aracely Marinelarena v. Merrick Garland

992 F.3d 1143
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided April 16, 2021·No. 14-72003·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ARACELY MARINELARENA, No. 14-72003 Petitioner,

Agency No.

v. A095-731-273

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney ORDER General, Respondent.

On Remand from the Supreme Court of the United States

Filed April 16, 2021

Before: Sidney R. Thomas, Chief Judge, and A. Wallace Tashima, Susan P. Graber, William A. Fletcher, Marsha S.

Berzon, Johnnie B. Rawlinson, Jay S. Bybee, Milan D. Smith, Jr., Sandra S. Ikuta, Paul J. Watford and Michelle T.

Friedland, Circuit Judges.

Order

2 MARINELARENA V. GARLAND

ORDER

The Supreme Court has remanded this case to the en banc court. See Wilkinson v. Marinelarena, 2021 WL 850613 (U.S. Mar. 8, 2021).

The case is further remanded to the three-judge panel “for further consideration in light of Pereida v. Wilkinson,” 141 S. Ct. 754 (Oct. 4, 2020).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Aracely Marinelarena v. Merrick Garland, 992 F.3d 1143 (9th Cir. 2021).

992 F.3d 1143 (Aracely Marinelarena v. Merrick Garland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Virginia Duncan v. Rob Bonta
Ninth Circuit, 2025