Aracely Marinelarena v. Jefferson Sessions

886 F.3d 737
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 29, 2018·No. 14-72003·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 29 2018 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ARACELY MARINELARENA, No. 14-72003

Petitioner, Agency No. A095-731-273

v.

ORDER

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General,

Respondent.

THOMAS, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that

this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a)

and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as

precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Aracely Marinelarena v. Jefferson Sessions, 886 F.3d 737 (9th Cir. 2018).

886 F.3d 737 (Aracely Marinelarena v. Jefferson Sessions) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related