Aracely Marinelarena v. Jefferson Sessions

Ninth Circuit

Aracely Marinelarena v. Jefferson Sessions

886 F.3d 737

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedMarch 29, 2018

Docket14-72003

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 886 F.3d 737 (Aracely Marinelarena v. Jefferson Sessions) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Aracely Marinelarena v. Jefferson Sessions, 886 F.3d 737 (9th Cir. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 29 2018 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ARACELY MARINELARENA, No. 14-72003

Petitioner, Agency No. A095-731-273

v. ORDER JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General,

Respondent.

THOMAS, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that

this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a)

and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as

precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI