Arabesque Recordings LLC v. Capacity LLC

45 A.D.3d 404, 846 N.Y.S.2d 43
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 15, 2007
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 45 A.D.3d 404 (Arabesque Recordings LLC v. Capacity LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Arabesque Recordings LLC v. Capacity LLC, 45 A.D.3d 404, 846 N.Y.S.2d 43 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Karla Moskowitz, J.), entered May 31, 2007, which granted defendant’s motion to vacate a default judgment, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

A corporation’s failure to file a change of address with the Secretary of State does not constitute a per se barrier to vacatur of a default judgment pursuant to CPLR 317, which permits a defendant who has been “served with a summons other than by personal delivery” and “who does not appear” to defend the action “upon a finding of the court that he did not personally receive notice of the summons in time to defend and has a meritorious defense” (see Eugene Di Lorenzo, Inc. v A.C. Dutton Lbr. Co., 67 NY2d 138, 141-142 [1986]). The affidavit submitted by defendant established that it did not receive personal notice of the summons in time to defend and that its defense was [405]*405meritorious. We reject plaintiff’s analogy to cases developed under the Vehicle and Traffic Law (see Cruz v Narisi, 32 AD3d 981, 983 [2006, Goldstein, J., concurring] [“since motor vehicles are mobile, timely notification of the change of address of a registered owner of a motor vehicle is vital”]).

Even if, as plaintiff contends, defendant’s motion should have been considered a motion to renew, it was properly granted (see B.B.Y. Diamonds Corp. v Five Star Designs, 6 AD3d 263, 264 [2004]). Defendant’s initial failure to submit an affidavit in admissible form was demonstrably inadvertent and plaintiff failed to show any prejudice attributable to the delay caused by the failure.

We have considered plaintiffs remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur—Andrias, J.P., Marlow, Williams, Buckley and Malone, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Robinson v. Nelson
2019 NY Slip Op 4284 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Acqua Capital, LLC v. Camarella Contr. Co., Inc.
2018 NY Slip Op 5992 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Acqua Capital, LLC v. 510 W. Boston Post Rd, LLC
2018 NY Slip Op 5991 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Evans v. City of Mt. Vernon
2018 NY Slip Op 5282 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Stillwell Café, Inc. v. 1680 Eastchester Realty Corp.
2016 NY Slip Op 8965 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Diggs v. Karen Manor Associates, LLC
117 A.D.3d 401 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Shanker v. 119 East 30th, Ltd.
63 A.D.3d 553 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Price v. Boston Road Development Corp.
56 A.D.2d 336 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
45 A.D.3d 404, 846 N.Y.S.2d 43, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arabesque-recordings-llc-v-capacity-llc-nyappdiv-2007.