A.R. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

A.R. v. State

504 So. 2d 66, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 877, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7399

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 25, 1987

DocketNo. 85-1931

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 504 So. 2d 66 (A.R. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

A.R. v. State, 504 So. 2d 66, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 877, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7399 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, a juvenile, appeals from his sentence for grand theft.

Defendant’s first point on appeal is that restitution was improper. We disagree. See J.S.H. v. State, 472 So.2d 737, 738 (Fla.1985).

Defendant’s second point, which the state concedes, is that the written order should conform to the trial court’s oral pronouncement of twenty-four hours of community service work and that the term of community control should be specified m accordance with F.R. v. State, 473 So.2d 785 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985). We agree.

The cause is remanded for correction of the sentence in accordance with this opinion.

LEHAN, A.C.J., SANDERLIN, J., and BOARDMAN, EDWARD F., (Ret.) J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI