A&R Transportation LLC, GSA Enterprises LLC and Cristian Villar-Silva v. Timothy Neyman

• Court: Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)
• Decided: February 12, 2026
• Docket: 08-25-00238-CV
• Status: Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS ———————————— No. 08-25-00238-CV ————————————

A&R Transportation LLC, GSA Enterprises LLC and Cristian Villar-Silva, Appellants v. Timothy Neyman, Appellee

On Appeal from the 109th District Court Winkler County, Texas Trial Court No. DC23-18509

M E MO RA N D UM O PI NI O N Before the Court is Appellants’ unopposed motion to dismiss this appeal. Although the

motion is not filed jointly, Appellants have attached a joint motion for dismissal and a proposed

order signed by all parties. Citing to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42, Appellants ask this

Court for “the rendition of an order that dismisses this appeal and remands the cause for further

proceedings in the district court.” This Court cannot both dismiss an appeal and remand to the district court. See

Tex. R. App. P. 43.2. Although styled as a motion to dismiss the appeal, the relief the parties

request is in substance that we set aside the judgment of the trial court and remand the cause for

rendition of judgment in accordance with their settlement agreement. Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B).

We deny the motion to the extent that it requests dismissal of the appeal, and we grant the

motion to set aside. Accordingly, we set aside the judgment of the trial court, and remand the case

for further proceedings in accordance with the parties’ agreement. Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B).

Costs are taxed against the party incurring the same pursuant to the unopposed motion. Tex. R.

App. P. 42.1(d).

MARIA SALAS MENDOZA, Chief Justice

February 12, 2026

Before Salas Mendoza, C.J., Palafox, and Soto, JJ.