Aquino v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
This text of Aquino v. Uber Technologies, Inc. (Aquino v. Uber Technologies, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
USDC SDNY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOCUMENT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ELECTRONICALLY FILED ANTHONY AQUINO, indhidualyandon Pee , individually and on eS tam * 2/8/202 behalf of all others similarly situated, et al., DATE FILED:_2/8/2023 Plaintiffs, 22-CV-4267 (KHP) -against- ORDER UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., Defendants. +--+ ----X KATHARINE H. PARKER, United States Magistrate Judge: As discussed at the February 7, 2023 case management conference, the Defendants’ letter motion to stay discovery in light of a pending motion to dismiss is DENIED. In deciding whether to grant a stay in discovery, the Court considers (1) whether the defendant has made a strong showing that the plaintiff’s claim is unmeritorious; (2) the breadth of discovery and the burden of responding to it; and (3) the risk of unfair prejudice to the party opposing the stay. See Johnson v. N.Y. Univ. Sch. of Educ., 205 F.R.D. 433, 434 (S.D.N.Y. 2002). Here, a stay is inappropriate as the initial discovery would not overburden the Defendants, and the Plaintiff would be prejudiced by delaying discovery. Further, without evaluating the merits of the Defendants’ motion to dismiss, the Court finds that the Defendants have not made the strong showing at this point that the Plaintiff’s claim unmeritorious. Additionally, the Defendants’ letter motion to bifurcate discovery is DENIED. As set forth in more detail on the record, bifurcation is not the most efficient way to proceed with discovery. Instead, discovery will be phased. Phase one discovery, to take place over the next 60 days, shall focus on Plaintiff’s individual claims, and the fact that a policy and procedure document applies not just to plaintiff but also to other putative class/collective members does
not preclude its discovery during the initial phase of discovery. To the contrary, such policy/procedure documents should be exchanged during this initial phase of discovery. The deadline for all fact discovery — individual and class/collective — is February 7, 2024. The deadline for initial disclosures is February 14, 2023. The initial disclosures shall be updated as appropriate at later phases of discovery. The deadline for interrogatories is Thursday, March 9, 2023. The deadline to amend the Complaint is April 3, 2023. The deadline to join parties is April 3, 2023. No further amendments/joinder of parties after the specified dates absent good cause. A case management conference is scheduled for April 3, 2023 at 12:00 p.m. in Courtroom 17-D, United States Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, New York, New York. As the above resolves the letter motion at ECF No. 57, the Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to close the motion. SO ORDERED. DATED: New York, New York February 8, 2023 EA haut H (2 ahr KATHARINE H. PARKER United States Magistrate Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Aquino v. Uber Technologies, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aquino-v-uber-technologies-inc-nysd-2023.