Aquilla Redditt v. Thomas C. Trimble, Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas, Jonesboro Division, at Jonesboro

186 F.2d 716
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 15, 1951
Docket14284
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 186 F.2d 716 (Aquilla Redditt v. Thomas C. Trimble, Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas, Jonesboro Division, at Jonesboro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Aquilla Redditt v. Thomas C. Trimble, Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas, Jonesboro Division, at Jonesboro, 186 F.2d 716 (8th Cir. 1951).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petition for writ of mandamus dismissed on the ground that the petition fails to state facts sufficient to justify the issuance of a writ of mandamus, and for the reason that it appears upon the face of the petition that petitioners appear to have abandoned their remedies in the Courts of the State of Arkansas rather than to have exhausted the remedies there available to them.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Redditt v. Hale Redditt v. Fogleman
199 F.2d 386 (Eighth Circuit, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
186 F.2d 716, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aquilla-redditt-v-thomas-c-trimble-judge-of-the-united-states-district-ca8-1951.