Aquilino v. United States

New York Court of Appeals

Aquilino v. United States

150 N.E.2d 707, 4 N.Y.2d 869

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 3, 1958

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 150 N.E.2d 707 (Aquilino v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Aquilino v. United States, 150 N.E.2d 707, 4 N.Y.2d 869 (N.Y. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of the remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein, as the opinion of the court indicates, there was presented and necessarily passed upon a question under the Constitution of the United States, namely, the construction of the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code (U. S. Code, tit. 26, §§ 3670-3672). Plaintiffs argued that such provisions were not decisive or controlling. This court held to the contrary. [See 3 N Y 2d 511.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of the remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein, as the opinion of the court indicates, there was presented and necessarily passed upon a question under the Constitution of the United States, namely, the construction of the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code (U. S. Code, tit. 26, §§ 3670-3672). Plaintiffs argued that such provisions were not decisive or controlling. This court held to the contrary. [See 3 N Y 2d 511.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

150 N.E.2d 707, 4 N.Y.2d 869, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aquilino-v-united-states-ny-1958.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack