Aquasciences International Inc. v. Levy

189 A.D.2d 688

Opinion

Order Supreme Court, New York County (Eugene Nardelli, J.), entered on or about September 4, 1991, which denied appellant’s motion to vacate a default, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The IAS Court did not abuse its discretion in determining that a meritorious defense was not shown (see, National Learning Corp. v Duramatic Press, 63 AD2d 695), or in determining that the affidavit of merit was insufficient (see, Mufalli v Ford Motor Co., 105 AD2d 642, 643). Here, the only averment of merit was a conclusory denial of the allegations, which is insufficient (see, Klenk v Kent, 103 AD2d 1002). Even though a party appears pro se, failure to set forth facts showing merit is fatal (see, Stewart v Warren, 134 AD2d 585). Concur—Carro, J. P., Milonas, Rosenberger, Ross and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Aquasciences International Inc. v. Levy, 189 A.D.2d 688 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

189 A.D.2d 688 (Aquasciences International Inc. v. Levy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

National Learning Corp. v. Duramatic Press, Inc.
63 A.D.2d 695 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
Klenk v. Kent
103 A.D.2d 1002 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Mufalli v. Ford Motor Co.
105 A.D.2d 642 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Stewart v. Warren
134 A.D.2d 585 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)