Aquarius Yacht & Tennis Club, Inc. v. Bouzek

300 So. 2d 23, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 8635
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 23, 1974·No. No. 73-1480·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Vliet v. Anthony, 119 Fla. 638, 160 So. 663; Moyer v. Moyer, Fla. App.1959, 114 So.2d 638; Downing v. Bird, Fla.App.1962, 145 So.2d 559; Croft v. Young, Fla.App.1966, 188 So.2d 859; Amrep Corporation v. Nicholson, Fla.App. 1970, 249 So.2d 84; Orange Julius Realty Corporation v. Sunshine Toy Center, Inc., Fla.App.1971, 251 So.2d 681; Latin American Benefit Center, Inc. v. Johstoneaux, Fla.App. 1972, 257 So.2d 86; In Re Estate of Merz, Fla.App.1973, 273 So.2d 795; Pierson v. Sharp, Fla.App.1973, 283 So.2d 880; Walton v. Walton, Fla.App.1974, 290 So.2d 110; Potash v. Dry & Company, 8 Fla.Supp. 174; Rule 1.190(b), R.C.P.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Aquarius Yacht & Tennis Club, Inc. v. Bouzek, 300 So. 2d 23, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 8635 (Fla. Ct. App. 1974).

300 So. 2d 23 (Aquarius Yacht & Tennis Club, Inc. v. Bouzek) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Walton v. Walton
290 So. 2d 110 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)
Moyer v. Moyer
114 So. 2d 638 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1959)
Downing v. Bird
145 So. 2d 559 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1962)
Pierson v. Sharp
283 So. 2d 880 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1973)
Croft v. Young
188 So. 2d 859 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)
Vliet v. Anthony, Et Vir.
160 So. 663 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1935)
Amrep Corp. v. Nicholson
249 So. 2d 84 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)
Orange Julius Realty Co. v. Sunshine Toy Center, Inc.
251 So. 2d 681 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)
Latin American Benefit Center, Inc. v. Johstoneaux
257 So. 2d 86 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1972)
In re Estate of Merz
273 So. 2d 795 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1973)