Aqua Shield v. Interpool Pool Cover Team
This text of Aqua Shield v. Interpool Pool Cover Team (Aqua Shield v. Interpool Pool Cover Team) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
AQUA SHIELD, Plaintiff-Cross-Appellant
v.
INTERPOOL POOL COVER TEAM, ALUKOV HZ SPOL SRO, ALUKOV SPOL SRO, POOL & SPA ENCLOSURES, Defendants-Appellants ______________________
2015-2009, 2015-2055 ______________________
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Utah in No. 2:09-cv-00013-TS, Senior Judge Ted Stewart. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
TODD E. ZENGER, Kirton & McConkie, Salt Lake City, UT, argued for plaintiff-cross-appellant.
GREGORY J. COFFEY, Coffey & Associates, Morristown, NJ, argued for defendants-appellants. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (TARANTO, CHEN, and STOLL, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
November 8, 2016 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Aqua Shield v. Interpool Pool Cover Team, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aqua-shield-v-interpool-pool-cover-team-cafc-2016.