Apted v. Apted

Missouri Court of Appeals

Apted v. Apted

521 S.W.3d 289, 2017 WL 2644039, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 608

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 20, 2017·No. No. ED 104688·Published

Opinion

[290] ORDER

PER CURIAM.

David Apted appeals from the judgment denying his motion to modify the amount of child support payments originally ordered in the judgment dissolving his marriage to Carla Apted. The judgment is not against the weight of the evidence and is supported by substantial evidence. No error of law appears. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[290] ORDER

PER CURIAM.

David Apted appeals from the judgment denying his motion to modify the amount of child support payments originally ordered in the judgment dissolving his marriage to Carla Apted. The judgment is not against the weight of the evidence and is supported by substantial evidence. No error of law appears. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Apted v. Apted, 521 S.W.3d 289, 2017 WL 2644039, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 608 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

521 S.W.3d 289 (Apted v. Apted) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.