APSCUF v. PSSHE
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
ASSOCIATION OF PENNSYLVANIA : No. 8 MM 2016 STATE COLLEGE AND UNIVERSITY : FACULTIES, :
:
Petitioner :
: :
v. :
: :
PENNSYLVANIA STATE SYSTEM OF : HIGHER EDUCATION; : COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, :
:
Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 29th day of March, 2016, as Petitioner has not established that
plenary jurisdiction is warranted, the Application for Extraordinary Relief is DENIED,
WITHOUT PREJUDICE to seek relief in the context of the pending direct appeals. See
Assoc. of Pennsylvania State College and University Faculties, 78 MAP 2015; Assoc. of
Pennsylvania State College and University Faculties, 10 MAP 2016.
To the extent that Petitioner seeks relief in the nature of a stay of the January 13,
2016 order, it is noted that it did not present such a request initially to the
Commonwealth Court. See Pa.R.A.P. 1732(a).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
APSCUF v. PSSHE (APSCUF v. PSSHE) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.