April v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

April v. State

511 S.W.3d 471, 2017 WL 770953

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 28, 2017

DocketNo. ED 103984

StatusPublished

This text of 511 S.W.3d 471 (April v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

April v. State, 511 S.W.3d 471, 2017 WL 770953 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Daniel April (“Movant”) appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Mov-ant claims his plea and sentencing counsel [472]*472provided ineffective assistance of counsel. We find that Movant’s claims are refuted by the record. Furthermore, we find the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous and affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Daniel April (“Movant”) appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. Mov-ant claims his plea and sentencing counsel [472]*472provided ineffective assistance of counsel. We find that Movant’s claims are refuted by the record. Furthermore, we find the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous and affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

511 S.W.3d 471, 2017 WL 770953, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/april-v-state-moctapp-2017.