April v. April, Abramson

New York Court of Appeals

April v. April, Abramson

7 N.E.2d 711, 273 N.Y. 598, 1937 N.Y. LEXIS 1329

DecidedMarch 16, 1937

StatusPublished

This text of 7 N.E.2d 711 (April v. April, Abramson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

April v. April, Abramson, 7 N.E.2d 711, 273 N.Y. 598, 1937 N.Y. LEXIS 1329 (N.Y. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion for a reargument or to amend the remittitur denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements. Without plaintiff’s knowledge payments were made both from principal and income while the trust fund was not sufficient security. Under the rules stated in the opinion the result of such payments was to deprive the plaintiff of the security to which she was entitled. This is true even though the payment was made in part from income. (See 272 N. Y, 331.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for a reargument or to amend the remittitur denied, with ten dollars costs and necessary printing disbursements. Without plaintiff’s knowledge payments were made both from principal and income while the trust fund was not sufficient security. Under the rules stated in the opinion the result of such payments was to deprive the plaintiff of the security to which she was entitled. This is true even though the payment was made in part from income. (See 272 N. Y, 331.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 N.E.2d 711, 273 N.Y. 598, 1937 N.Y. LEXIS 1329, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/april-v-april-abramson-ny-1937.