April Palmer v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security

N.D. Ohio

April Palmer v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security

DecidedDecember 3, 2025

Docket1:25-cv-00135

StatusUnknown

This text of April Palmer v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security (April Palmer v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Ohio primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

April Palmer v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security, (N.D. Ohio 2025).

Pincite

Opinion

PEARSON, J. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

APRIL PALMER, ) ) CASE NO. 1:25CV0135 Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) JUDGE BENITA Y. PEARSON ) FRANK BISIGNANO,! ) COMMISSIONER OF ) SOCIAL SECURITY, ) ) MEMORANDUM OF OPINION Defendant. ) AND ORDER

An Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) denied Plaintiff April Palmer’s applications for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) and supplemental security income (“SSI”) after a hearing in the above-captioned case. That decision — that Plaintiff was not disabled from June 11, 2018 through June 2, 2020 — became the final determination of the Commissioner of Social Security when the Appeals Council denied the request to review the ALJ’s decision. The claimant sought judicial review of the Commissioner’s decision, and the Court referred the case to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay for preparation of a report and recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Local Rule 72.2(b)(1). On November 17, 2025, the magistrate judge submitted a Report (ECF No. 12) recommending that the Court affirm the Commissioner’s decision. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2) provides that objections to a report and recommendation must be filed within 14 days after service. Objections to the magistrate judge’s Report were, therefore, due on December 1, 2025. Neither party has filed objections, evidencing satisfaction with the

' On May 7, 2025, Bisignano became the Commissioner of Social Security. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d), his name has been automatically substituted as a party.

(1:25CV0135) magistrate judge’s recommendations. Any further review by this Court would be a duplicative and inefficient use of the Court’s limited resources. Thomas v. Arn, 728 F.2d 813 (6th Cir. 1984), aff'd, 474 US. 140 (1985); Howard v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 932 F.2d 505 (6th Cir. 1991); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949-50 (6th Cir. 1981), Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the magistrate judge is hereby adopted. The decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is affirmed. Judgment will be entered in favor of Defendant.

IT ISSO ORDERED.

December 3, 2025 /s/ Benita Y. Pearson Date Benita Y. Pearson United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PEARSON, J. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

APRIL PALMER, ) ) CASE NO. 1:25CV0135 Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) JUDGE BENITA Y. PEARSON ) FRANK BISIGNANO,! ) COMMISSIONER OF ) SOCIAL SECURITY, ) ) MEMORANDUM OF OPINION Defendant. ) AND ORDER

An Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) denied Plaintiff April Palmer’s applications for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) and supplemental security income (“SSI”) after a hearing in the above-captioned case. That decision — that Plaintiff was not disabled from June 11, 2018 through June 2, 2020 — became the final determination of the Commissioner of Social Security when the Appeals Council denied the request to review the ALJ’s decision. The claimant sought judicial review of the Commissioner’s decision, and the Court referred the case to Magistrate Judge Darrell A. Clay for preparation of a report and recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Local Rule 72.2(b)(1). On November 17, 2025, the magistrate judge submitted a Report (ECF No. 12) recommending that the Court affirm the Commissioner’s decision. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2) provides that objections to a report and recommendation must be filed within 14 days after service. Objections to the magistrate judge’s Report were, therefore, due on December 1, 2025. Neither party has filed objections, evidencing satisfaction with the

' On May 7, 2025, Bisignano became the Commissioner of Social Security. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d), his name has been automatically substituted as a party.

(1:25CV0135) magistrate judge’s recommendations. Any further review by this Court would be a duplicative and inefficient use of the Court’s limited resources. Thomas v. Arn, 728 F.2d 813 (6th Cir. 1984), aff'd, 474 US. 140 (1985); Howard v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 932 F.2d 505 (6th Cir. 1991); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949-50 (6th Cir. 1981), Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the magistrate judge is hereby adopted. The decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is affirmed. Judgment will be entered in favor of Defendant.

IT ISSO ORDERED.

December 3, 2025 /s/ Benita Y. Pearson Date Benita Y. Pearson United States District Judge

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

April Palmer v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/april-palmer-v-frank-bisignano-commissioner-of-social-security-ohnd-2025.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack