April Michelle Moore v. Roy Daniel Morgan
This text of April Michelle Moore v. Roy Daniel Morgan (April Michelle Moore v. Roy Daniel Morgan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
APRIL MICHELLE MOORE, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
v. CASE NO. 1D15-492
ROY DANIEL MORGAN,
Appellee.
_____________________________/
Opinion filed July 8, 2015.
An appeal from the Circuit Court for Baker County. Phyllis M. Rosier, Judge.
Summer N. Boyd, Jacksonville, for Appellant.
John S. Cooper of Law Offices of Cooper & Loper, Starke, for Appellee.
KELSEY, J.
We affirm the order on appeal, without prejudice to either party’s pursuit of
modification before the trial court pursuant to section 61.13(3), Florida Statutes
(2014), to address any substantial change of circumstances that may have occurred
subsequent to the September 2014 hearing and January 2, 2015 order. See Wade v. Hirschman, 903 So. 2d 928, 932-33 (Fla. 2005) (articulating substantial change test
for child custody modifications); Skirko v. Skirko, 677 So. 2d 885, 887 (Fla. 3d DCA
1996) (modification was warranted where substantial change of circumstances had
occurred, including child’s school schedule and parents’ places of residence and
work hours; and child’s best interests were served by modification).
THOMAS and MARSTILLER, JJ., CONCUR.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
April Michelle Moore v. Roy Daniel Morgan, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/april-michelle-moore-v-roy-daniel-morgan-fladistctapp-2015.