Aprea v. Oglethorpe Savings & Trust Co.

111 S.E. 215, 28 Ga. App. 408, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 553
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided March 20, 1922·No. 12826·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Hill, J.

1. Knowledge of the consideration of a note is not notice that the consideration has failed, if it has failed; and one who buys the note bona fide, for value and before maturity, is not bound to inquire whether there was a failure of consideration. Citizens Bank of Vidalia v. Greene, 12 Ga. App. 49 (3) (76 S. E. 795).

2. Where, therefore, the defense set up in the plea did not come within any of the provisions of § 4286 of the Civil Code (1910), the court did not err in striking it. Benton Transfer Co. v. Marion Nat. Bank, 26 Ga. App. 562 (106 S. E. 735).

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur. Complaint; from city court of Savannah — Judge Freeman. August 6, 1921. Oliver & Oliver, for plaintiff in error. George H. Richter, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Aprea v. Oglethorpe Savings & Trust Co., 111 S.E. 215, 28 Ga. App. 408, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 553 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

111 S.E. 215 (Aprea v. Oglethorpe Savings & Trust Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Banking Co. v. Morgan
118 S.E. 415 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)