Aprea v. Cipolla

187 A.D. 894
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 15, 1919·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. The agreement under which plaintiff was employed states that plaintiff “ takes charge as partner of the metal department with one-half share of the net profits.” This distinguishes the case at bar from the cases cited by the respondent and entitled the plaintiff to examine the books of tho defendant to ascertain the amount of the net profits during the time covered by the complaint. (Thomas v. Waite Co., 113 App. Div. 494; Sullivan v. Ryan-Parker Construction Co., No. 1, 148 id. 243.) Jenks, P. J., Mills, Putnam, Kelly and Jaycox, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Aprea v. Cipolla, 187 A.D. 894 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1919).

187 A.D. 894 (Aprea v. Cipolla) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Schreier v. Mascola
81 A.D.2d 909 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)