Approved Pharmaceutical Corp. v. Putter

127 A.D.2d 978, 513 N.Y.S.2d 53, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43465
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 27, 1987·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order unanimously modified on the law by deleting the second decretal paragraph, and as modified affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Special Term correctly denied defendant insurance companies’ motions to dismiss. We do not, however, agree with Special Term that an order compelling the insurance companies to defend the action brought against Approved Pharmaceutical for indemnity should have been granted. Before applying the principles set forth in O’Dowd v American Sur. Co. (3 NY2d 347), there must first be a determination that liability coverage exists. No such determination has been made. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Balio, J. — summary judgment-declaratory judgment.) Present —Callahan, J. P., Denman, Green, Pine and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Approved Pharmaceutical Corp. v. Putter, 127 A.D.2d 978, 513 N.Y.S.2d 53, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43465 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

127 A.D.2d 978 (Approved Pharmaceutical Corp. v. Putter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Approved Pharmaceutical Corp. v. Putter
155 A.D.2d 947 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)