Appointment of Auditor

75 Pa. D. & C.2d 111, 1976 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 197
CourtPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Beaver County
DecidedMarch 10, 1976
Docketno. 436 of 1976
StatusPublished

This text of 75 Pa. D. & C.2d 111 (Appointment of Auditor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Beaver County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Appointment of Auditor, 75 Pa. D. & C.2d 111, 1976 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 197 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1976).

Opinion

KLEIN, J.,

We have before us a petition for appointment of an auditor to fill a vacancy. The pertinent provision of the Township Code provides:

“When a vacancy occurs in the office of auditor in any township by reason of death, resignation, removal from the township, or otherwise, the court of quarter sessions shall, upon the petition of not less than five registered electors, appoint a suitable person to hold such office for the unexpired term of the person whose place he is appointed to fill.”

Petitioners are the three supervisors, the township secretary and the township chief of police, all duly registered electors. Since they are also electors, the petition is apparently proper, at least, technically. However, we deem it exceedingly bad practice for the persons whose accounts are to be audited to petition for the appointment of an auditor.

Further, we conclude that it is, as it should be, illegal. The legislature knows how to call for petition or appointment by supervisors when it wishes to do so. See Second Class Township Code of May 1, 1933, P.L. 103, as amended, 53 P.S. §65420 (appointment of supervisors), and 53 P.S. §65423 (petition for appointment of tax collector). The principle “expressio unius est exclusio alterius” applies [113]*113herein and is controlling. The provision with respect to tax collector vacancies sets forth, “supervisors or . . . five . . . electors.”

For these reasons, we enter the following

ORDER

And now, March 10, 1976, the within petition is hereby refused, without prejudice to the possible future appointment of Richard J. Phillips upon a proper petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
75 Pa. D. & C.2d 111, 1976 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 197, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/appointment-of-auditor-pactcomplbeaver-1976.