Applied Materials, Inc. v. Multimetrixs, LLC
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
APPLIED MATERIALS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
MULTIMETRIXS, LLC, MARK KESEL, BORIS KESIL, and ELIK GERSHENZON, Defendants-Appellants. ____________________
2010-1149, -1150 ______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 06-CV-7372, Judge Marilyn Hall Patel. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
ROHIT K. SINGLA, Munger, Tolles & Olson, LLP, of San Francisco, California, argued for plaintiff-appellee. With him on the brief were VIRGINIA L. BOESCH and SARALA V. NAGALA.
JEFFREY I. KAPLAN, Kaplan Gilman & Pergament LLP, of Woodbridge, New Jersey, argued for defendant- appellee. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (GAJARSA, PROST, and MOORE, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
December 9, 2010 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Applied Materials, Inc. v. Multimetrixs, LLC (Applied Materials, Inc. v. Multimetrixs, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.