Applied Materials, Inc. v. Multimetrixs, LLC

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Applied Materials, Inc. v. Multimetrixs, LLC. Read the opinion of the Court — 404 F. App'x 493
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided December 9, 2010·No. 2010-1149·Unpublished

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

APPLIED MATERIALS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

MULTIMETRIXS, LLC, MARK KESEL, BORIS KESIL, and ELIK GERSHENZON, Defendants-Appellants. ____________________

2010-1149, -1150 ______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 06-CV-7372, Judge Marilyn Hall Patel. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

ROHIT K. SINGLA, Munger, Tolles & Olson, LLP, of San Francisco, California, argued for plaintiff-appellee. With him on the brief were VIRGINIA L. BOESCH and SARALA V. NAGALA.

JEFFREY I. KAPLAN, Kaplan Gilman & Pergament LLP, of Woodbridge, New Jersey, argued for defendant- appellee. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (GAJARSA, PROST, and MOORE, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

December 9, 2010 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Applied Materials, Inc. v. Multimetrixs, LLC, (Fed. Cir. 2010).

Applied Materials, Inc. v. Multimetrixs, LLC (Applied Materials, Inc. v. Multimetrixs, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.