Application of Peppers Refining Co.

272 P.2d 416
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedJuly 1, 1954
Docket36054
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 272 P.2d 416 (Application of Peppers Refining Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Application of Peppers Refining Co., 272 P.2d 416 (Okla. 1954).

Opinion

-"BLACKBIRD, Justice.

This appeal involves well-spacing in an area underlying an oil pool or common *417 source of oil supply comprised of large portions of four adjoining sections of -land,known as the “Peavine Field” of Oklahoma County, Oklahoma. The sections involved are 2, 3, 10 and 11 of Township 14 North, Range 2 West.

On October 9, 1951, the Corporation Commission, by Order No. 25155, issued in its Cause CD No. 3372, prescribed 20-acre well-spacing units for the only portions of those sections then apparently indicated as overlying said pool. The well-spacing plan thereby prescribed authorized the drilling of only one well on each twenty acres, to be located in the center of one of the two 10-acre tracts comprising the unit. According to the drilling pattern thereby established, the well locations were to vary from northwest to southeast in each alternate unit, beginning at the northwest corner of the area and running from north to- south down each tier of units, so that the- most northwesterly unit in the area was to have its well located in the center of its W/2, while the one directly adjoining it on the south would have its well in its E/2, etc., with there being a well in the Northwest 10-acres and another well in the Southeast 10-acres of each 40-acre square area in the field. Exceptions were made to this drilling pattern, however, in the instance of eight wells already drilling or completed that had not been located in conformity with this pattern. These wells were indicated by black dots with the abbreviation “Ex” and a small arrow pointing to them on a plat of the area marked,“Exhibit ‘A’ ”, attached to the Order and depicted below on what we shall hereinafter refer to as: “Map 1”. It will be noted from this map that most of *418 the 40-acre areas shown thereon are divided into two 20-acre spacing units by a line running horizontally- across them, but that two of those depicted with “Exception” locations thereon, are shown to be divided into such units by vertical lines. In other words, most of such tracts are split in half, leaving a North unit and a South unit, but those two 40-acre tracts are divided into an East 20-acres or unit and a West 20, or unit.

*417 EXHIBIT "A"
Corp Com Order No. 25155 CD 3372 9 Oct 51 20 acre Spacing (NW & SE) Wilcox Sd, Pea Vine Pool, Okla. Co.
H 2 W

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

El Paso Natural Gas Co. v. Corporation Commission
1981 OK 150 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1981)
Marlin Oil Corp. v. Corp. Commission
1977 OK 67 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1977)
State Oil & Gas Bd. v. Mississippi Min. & Roy. Own. Ass'n
258 So. 2d 767 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1971)
Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Corporation Commission
1971 OK 13 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1971)
Ward v. Corporation Commission
1970 OK 108 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1970)
Cameron v. Corporation Commission
1966 OK 193 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1966)
Kingwood Oil Company v. Corporation Commission
1964 OK 241 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1964)
Sinclair Oil & Gas Company v. Corporation Commission
1963 OK 23 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1963)
Application of Bennett
1960 OK 100 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1960)
Application of Champlin Refining Company
1956 OK 132 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1956)
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Corporation Commission
285 P.2d 847 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1955)
Application of Peppers Refining Company
1955 OK 130 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1955)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
272 P.2d 416, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/application-of-peppers-refining-co-okla-1954.