Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus of Stewart v. Belnap

318 P.2d 324, 51 Wash. 2d 893, 1957 Wash. LEXIS 567
Washington Supreme Court·Decided November 29, 1957·No. No. 34425·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The petitioner was found guilty of the crime of taking a motor vehicle without the permission of the owner in violation of RCW 9.54.020, Rem. Rev. Stat. § 2601-1. The trial court entered judgment and sentence that the petitioner be imprisoned for a period of not more than twenty years.

For the reasons indicated in In re Klapproth v. Squier (1957), 50 Wn. (2d) 675, 314 P. (2d) 430, and in In re Richey v. Squier (1957), ante p. 38, 315 P. (2d) 638, it is necessary to correct the sentence pronounced by changing the maximum from twenty to ten years, as provided by RCW 9.92.010, Rem. Rev. Stat., § 2265.

The respondent is directed to produce the petitioner in the court where he was convicted, and where judgment and sentence was pronounced; and that court is directed to impose a corrected sentence, as indicated in this opinion and in the cases cited.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus of Stewart v. Belnap, 318 P.2d 324, 51 Wash. 2d 893, 1957 Wash. LEXIS 567 (Wash. 1957).

318 P.2d 324 (Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus of Stewart v. Belnap) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In RE KLAPPROTH v. Squier
314 P.2d 430 (Washington Supreme Court, 1957)
Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus of Richey v. Squier
315 P.2d 638 (Washington Supreme Court, 1957)