Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus of Powers v. Schneckloth

Washington Supreme Court

Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus of Powers v. Schneckloth

315 P.2d 639, 51 Wash. 2d 891, 1957 Wash. LEXIS 563

Washington Supreme Court·Decided September 17, 1957·No. No. 34056·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

On November 14, 1952, the petitioner was found guilty of the crime of taking a motor vehicle without permission of the owner, in violation of RCW 9.54.020, Rem. Rev. Stat., § 2601-1. The court entered judgment and sentence that petitioner be punished by imprisonment for a period of not more than twenty years.

For the same reasons indicated in the per curiam opinion in In re Richey v. Squier, ante p. 38, 315 P. (2d) 638, filed this day, the petitioner is to be returned to the court where his plea was entered, and that court is directed to impose a corrected sentence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

On November 14, 1952, the petitioner was found guilty of the crime of taking a motor vehicle without permission of the owner, in violation of RCW 9.54.020, Rem. Rev. Stat., § 2601-1. The court entered judgment and sentence that petitioner be punished by imprisonment for a period of not more than twenty years.

For the same reasons indicated in the per curiam opinion in In re Richey v. Squier, ante p. 38, 315 P. (2d) 638, filed this day, the petitioner is to be returned to the court where his plea was entered, and that court is directed to impose a corrected sentence.

Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus of Powers v. Schneckloth, 315 P.2d 639, 51 Wash. 2d 891, 1957 Wash. LEXIS 563 (Wash. 1957).

Pincite

315 P.2d 639 (Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus of Powers v. Schneckloth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related