Appliance Solutions v. Rose Crawford

247 S.W.3d 589, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 360
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 18, 2008·No. ED 90389·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appliance Solutions appeals from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s (Commission) decision finding Rose Crawford was not disqualified for unemployment benefits. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the Commission’s decision is supported by competent and substantial evidence. Section 288.210 RSMo 2006. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appliance Solutions v. Rose Crawford, 247 S.W.3d 589, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 360 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

247 S.W.3d 589 (Appliance Solutions v. Rose Crawford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related