Appliance Solutions v. Rose Crawford
This text of 247 S.W.3d 589 (Appliance Solutions v. Rose Crawford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Appliance Solutions appeals from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s (Commission) decision finding Rose Crawford was not disqualified for unemployment benefits. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the Commission’s decision is supported by competent and substantial evidence. Section 288.210 RSMo 2006. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
247 S.W.3d 589, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 360, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/appliance-solutions-v-rose-crawford-moctapp-2008.