Applewhite Mortgage & Investment Co. v. Vaccaro
This text of 556 P.2d 542 (Applewhite Mortgage & Investment Co. v. Vaccaro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
Respondents sought and recovered damages which resulted from appellant’s breach of a commitment to loan money to finance the construction of respondents’ home. Appellant contends this was error. We disagree.
The district court’s finding of detrimental reliance is supported by substantial evidence, and, thus, we will not disturb it on appeal. Alves v. Bumguardner, 91 Nev. 799, 544 P.2d 436 (1975); County of Clark v. Lucas, 91 Nev. 263, 534 P.2d 499 (1975).
Other contentions by appellant are without merit, and we need not consider them.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
556 P.2d 542, 92 Nev. 647, 1976 Nev. LEXIS 706, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/applewhite-mortgage-investment-co-v-vaccaro-nev-1976.