Appletree Lane, Inc. v. Notov-Lew

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Appletree Lane, Inc. v. Notov-Lew

242 A.D.2d 624, 664 N.Y.S.2d 741, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9064

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 22, 1997

StatusPublished

This text of 242 A.D.2d 624 (Appletree Lane, Inc. v. Notov-Lew) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Appletree Lane, Inc. v. Notov-Lew, 242 A.D.2d 624, 664 N.Y.S.2d 741, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9064 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

In an eviction proceeding pursuant to RPAPL 713 (5) to recover possession of real property, Rochelle Notov-Lew appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Schmidt, J.), entered September 5, 1996, as, in effect, granted the petition and directed her to vacate the premises.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

In a proceeding to recover possession of real property, the petition must “[s]tate the facts upon which the special proceeding is based” (RPAPL 741 [4]). Here, the petition clearly satisfied that requirement (see, e.g., Boll v Shanly, 34 AD2d 875). The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the petition. Bracken, J. P., Rosenblatt, Goldstein and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an eviction proceeding pursuant to RPAPL 713 (5) to recover possession of real property, Rochelle Notov-Lew appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Schmidt, J.), entered September 5, 1996, as, in effect, granted the petition and directed her to vacate the premises.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

In a proceeding to recover possession of real property, the petition must “[s]tate the facts upon which the special proceeding is based” (RPAPL 741 [4]). Here, the petition clearly satisfied that requirement (see, e.g., Boll v Shanly, 34 AD2d 875). The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the petition. Bracken, J. P., Rosenblatt, Goldstein and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

242 A.D.2d 624, 664 N.Y.S.2d 741, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9064, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/appletree-lane-inc-v-notov-lew-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack