Appleton v. Speer

6 N.Y.S. 511, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 657

This text of 6 N.Y.S. 511 (Appleton v. Speer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Appleton v. Speer, 6 N.Y.S. 511, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 657 (superctny 1889).

Opinion

Sedgwick, C. J.

From the original papers, taken together, on which the order of attachment was issued, it appeared that some facts, the existence of which it was necessary to prove, were sworn to upon information and belief, and the source of the information not disclosed. For this reason the court below was correct in granting the motion to vacate the order. The original defect could not be remedied by proving, by other affidavits produced upon the motion to vacate, that the facts referred to really existed at the time; nor is this true, because the motion to vacate was made upon the original papers, when the plaintiff has no right to present additional papers. Bank v. Alberger, 75 N. Y. 179. The order should be affirmed, with $10 costs.

[512]*512Freedman, J., concurs.

Truax, J.

The order should be affirmed for the reasons assigned by the chief judge. See Cribben v. Schillinger, 30 Hun, 248; Bank v. Ward, 35 Hun, 395; Buhl v. Ball, 41 Hun, 61; Lee v. Association, 2 N. Y. Supp. 864.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Steuben County Bank v. . Alberger
75 N.Y. 179 (New York Court of Appeals, 1878)
Lee v. Co-operative Life & Accident Ass'n of United States
2 N.Y.S. 864 (New York Supreme Court, 1888)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 N.Y.S. 511, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 657, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/appleton-v-speer-superctny-1889.