Appleton v. Nye

243 A.D. 852
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 15, 1935
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 243 A.D. 852 (Appleton v. Nye) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Appleton v. Nye, 243 A.D. 852 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Opinion

Judgment as to defendant Nye reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to said appellant to abide the event; judgment as to Aekerly against Biddlecome reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to said appellant to abide the event, unless the plaintiff Aekerly shall, within ten days, stipulate to reduce the verdict to the sum of $6,000 as of the date of the rendition thereof, in which event the judgment is modified accordingly, [853]*853and as so modified is affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party; judgment as to Appleton against Biddlecome affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: The finding that defendant Nye was guilty of negligence is against the weight of the evidence, and the damages awarded plaintiff Ackerly excessive. All concur. (The judgment awarded plaintiffs damages in an automobile negligence action.) Present — Sears, P. J., Edgcomb, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lopoczyk v. Chester A. Poling, Inc.
60 F. Supp. 839 (S.D. New York, 1945)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
243 A.D. 852, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/appleton-v-nye-nyappdiv-1935.