Appleton v. Marx
102 N.Y.S. 2, 117 A.D. 206
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 11, 1907·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed on the opinion of the referee. All concur, except LAUGHRIN, J., who dissents upon the grounds of error in allowing recovery for items not embraced in bill of particulars, and for incompetent and insufficient proof of reasonable cost of making required repairs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Appleton v. Marx, 102 N.Y.S. 2, 117 A.D. 206 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1907).
102 N.Y.S. 2 (Appleton v. Marx) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Alexander S. v. Arnold Constable
250 A.2d 792 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1969)
Della Vecchia v. World Scope Publishing Co.
165 A.2d 872 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1960)
Rau v. McCorkle
131 A.2d 895 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1957)
Fincke v. Borkel
121 N.Y.S. 290 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910)