Applegren's Estate

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Applegren's Estate

59 Pa. Super. 289, 1915 Pa. Super. LEXIS 66

Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 24, 1915·No. Appeal, No. 196·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Notwithstanding the earnest and able argument of appellant’s counsel, our examination of the evidence and consideration of the legal principles applicable thereto lead us to the conclusion that the court did not err in rejecting the appellant’s claim. In our judgment this action is fully vindicated by the opinion of the auditing judge and the opinion of the court dismissing the exceptions to his adjudication. We deem it unnecessary to add anything to what they have said.

[295] The assignments of error are overruled and the decree dismissing the appellant’s exceptions to the adjudication is affirmed, the costs of this appeal to be paid by the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

Notwithstanding the earnest and able argument of appellant’s counsel, our examination of the evidence and consideration of the legal principles applicable thereto lead us to the conclusion that the court did not err in rejecting the appellant’s claim. In our judgment this action is fully vindicated by the opinion of the auditing judge and the opinion of the court dismissing the exceptions to his adjudication. We deem it unnecessary to add anything to what they have said.

[295] The assignments of error are overruled and the decree dismissing the appellant’s exceptions to the adjudication is affirmed, the costs of this appeal to be paid by the appellant.

Applegren's Estate, 59 Pa. Super. 289, 1915 Pa. Super. LEXIS 66 (Pa. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

59 Pa. Super. 289 (Applegren's Estate) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related