Applegate v. Taylor
This text of 56 Miss. 685 (Applegate v. Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
The garnishee was the debtor of Mrs. McLaughlin, and not of her husband, because it was on her credit and by her means that the contract was made and performed; and, although her husband did part of the work, and directed all of it, that did not deprive her of her right to claim pay for the performance of the contract she had made,, and given security to perform, and [688]*688which, but for her, would not have been made, and which was fulfilled chiefly by her credit and means. Hamilton v. Booth, 55 Miss. 60.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
56 Miss. 685, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/applegate-v-taylor-miss-1879.