Applegate v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.
37 S.W. 1129, 1 Indian Terr. 393, 1896 Indian Terr. LEXIS 46
Opinion
The facts in this case are substa tially the same as the facts in case No. 64, Insurance Co. Kearney, 1 Ind. Ter. 828; and, for the reasons given int] opinion in that case, the petition for an alternative writ mandamus is refused.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Applegate v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co., 37 S.W. 1129, 1 Indian Terr. 393, 1896 Indian Terr. LEXIS 46 (Conn. 1896).
37 S.W. 1129 (Applegate v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Montgomery County Fiscal Court v. Trimble
47 S.W. 773 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1898)