Home/Court Of Appeals Of Indian Territory/Applegate v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.

Applegate v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.

37 S.W. 1129, 1 Indian Terr. 393, 1896 Indian Terr. LEXIS 46
CourtCourt Of Appeals Of Indian Territory
DecidedSeptember 19, 1896
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 37 S.W. 1129 (Applegate v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court Of Appeals Of Indian Territory primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Applegate v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co., 37 S.W. 1129, 1 Indian Terr. 393, 1896 Indian Terr. LEXIS 46 (Conn. 1896).

Opinion

Springer, C. J.

The facts in this case are substa tially the same as the facts in case No. 64, Insurance Co. Kearney, 1 Ind. Ter. 828; and, for the reasons given int] opinion in that case, the petition for an alternative writ mandamus is refused.

Lewis, J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Montgomery County Fiscal Court v. Trimble
47 S.W. 773 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1898)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
37 S.W. 1129, 1 Indian Terr. 393, 1896 Indian Terr. LEXIS 46, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/applegate-v-chicago-r-i-p-ry-co-ctappindterr-1896.