Applebrook Country Dayschool, Inc. v. Thurman

613 S.E.2d 192, 272 Ga. App. 639, 2005 Fulton County D. Rep. 1179, 2005 Ga. App. LEXIS 357, 2005 WL 767861
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 6, 2005
DocketA03A1252
StatusPublished

This text of 613 S.E.2d 192 (Applebrook Country Dayschool, Inc. v. Thurman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Applebrook Country Dayschool, Inc. v. Thurman, 613 S.E.2d 192, 272 Ga. App. 639, 2005 Fulton County D. Rep. 1179, 2005 Ga. App. LEXIS 357, 2005 WL 767861 (Ga. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

Ruffin, Chief Judge.

In Division 1 of Applebrook Country Dayschool v. Thurman,1 we found that the trial court erred in admitting expert testimony regarding the standard of care for supervision in a day care setting. The Supreme Court subsequently granted certiorari and reversed, holding that “[e]xpert testimony regarding infant sleep positioning is admissible in a negligent childcare supervision case to assist the jury in determining whether the childcare provider breached its duty of care.”2 Accordingly, we vacate Division 1 of our earlier opinion and adopt the judgment and opinion of the Supreme Court as our own. The Supreme Court’s reversal does not affect Divisions 2 and 3 of our prior opinion.

Judgment affirmed.

Smith, P. J., and Miller, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thurman v. Applebrook Country Dayschool, Inc.
604 S.E.2d 832 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2004)
Applebrook Country Dayschool, Inc. v. Thurman
591 S.E.2d 406 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
613 S.E.2d 192, 272 Ga. App. 639, 2005 Fulton County D. Rep. 1179, 2005 Ga. App. LEXIS 357, 2005 WL 767861, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/applebrook-country-dayschool-inc-v-thurman-gactapp-2005.