Applebaum v. Naiberg
This text of 197 Misc. 317 (Applebaum v. Naiberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It was error to assess damages upon the theory
that the entire garment was rendered worthless in the process of dry cleaning. The evidence does not support such a finding. The proper measure of damages in this case is the difference between the value of the suit as delivered to defendant and its actual value in the condition in which it was returned. (Beyer [318]*318v. Kramer, N. Y. L. J., Jan. 24, 1949, p. 285, col. 6; Gardner v. Gildenblatt, N. Y. L. J., Dec. 22, 1943, p. 1867, col. 4; 1 Clark on New York Law of Damages, § 185, p. 312.)
The judgment should be unanimously reversed upon the law and a new trial granted, with $10 costs to defendant to abide the event.
Steinbrink, Rtjbenstein and Golden, JJ., concur.
Judgment reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
197 Misc. 317, 97 N.Y.S.2d 702, 1950 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1696, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/applebaum-v-naiberg-nyappterm-1950.