Apple, Inc. v. Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company, et al.

District Court, N.D. California·Decided February 9, 2026·No. 3:24-cv-03738·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 6 7 APPLE, INC., Case No. 24-cv-03738-RFL (LJC)

8 Plaintiff, ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY 9 v. DISPUTE

10 STARR SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE Re: Dkt. No. 103 COMPANY, et al., 11 Defendants.

12 13 Having reviewed the parties’ Joint Discovery Letter, ECF No. 103, the accompanying 14 record, the allegations in the Second Amended Complaint, and relevant authorities, including 15 Colonial Life & Accident Ins. Co. v. Superior Ct., 31 Cal. 3d 785, 791 (1982), the undersigned 16 finds that Apple has sufficiently established that the information that it seeks is relevant to its 17 claim that Endurance American Specialty Insurance Company (“Endurance”) breached its duty of 18 good faith and fair dealing through various alleged settlement practices. The discovery requests, 19 however, appear in the aggregate to be disproportionate to the needs of the case and unduly 20 burdensome in light of the declaration provided by Endurance’s declarant, ECF No. 103-3. The 21 undersigned orders the following to partially resolve the dispute, collect more about the volume of 22 potentially discoverable information, and give the parties a renewed opportunity to resolve their 23 discovery disputes on their own. 24 First, Endurance shall produce the six Harvest Festival claims files by February 20, 25 2026. There are sufficient parallels between the Astroworld Concert and Harvest Festival to 26 warrant discovery in to how these claims were managed and settled. See Colonial, 31 Cal. 3d at 27 791 (the knowing commission of an unfair claim settlement practice may be established through ] Second, by February 20, 2026, Endurance shall identify how many unique claims files it 2 || has that involve all of the following four criteria: (1) personal injury or wrongful death (rather than 3 || property) claims, (2) concerts, sporting events, or other mass-audience events, (3) from 2021 4 || onward, and (4) where Endurance and the insured had a coverage dispute, such as a dispute over 5 reasonableness or exhaustion, or refusal to contribute to a settlement. Of the claims files that meet 6 || all four criteria, Endurance shall identify (1) how many claims files involve actions resulting in a 7 || settlement, verdict or judgment that exceeded $10 million (regardless of the amount, if any, 8 || Endurance paid), and, separately, (2) how many claims files involve Endurance making payments 9 || for over $10 million. 10 Third, on February 26, 2026 at 1:00 pm Endurance and Apple shall meet and confer in 11 person in Courtroom G to address what remains of this discovery dispute unless the dispute has 12 || already been resolved by agreement. Any such agreement shall be memorialized with a 13 stipulation filed on the case docket for the undersigned’s review before February 26, 2026. 14 IT IS SO ORDERED. 16 || Dated: February 9, 2026

Z 18 | hatipry LISA J/CISNEBOS 19 Un CAIs Magistrate Judge 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Apple, Inc. v. Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company, et al., (N.D. Cal. 2026).

Apple, Inc. v. Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company, et al. (Apple, Inc. v. Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company, et al.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Colonial Life & Accident Insurance v. Superior Court
647 P.2d 86 (California Supreme Court, 1982)