Apple Inc. v. International Trade Commission

Federal Circuit

Apple Inc. v. International Trade Commission

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedJanuary 10, 2012

Docket2012-1125

StatusUnpublished

This text of Apple Inc. v. International Trade Commission (Apple Inc. v. International Trade Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Apple Inc. v. International Trade Commission, (Fed. Cir. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

NOTE: ThiS order is nonprecedential United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit APPLE INC., Appellcmt, v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee, ' _ AND HTC CORPORATION AND HTC AMERICA,` INC., In,teruenors. ‘ 2012-1125 0n appeal from the United States Internationa1Trade Comn:1ission in Investigation No. 337-TA-710. ON MOTION ORDER Upon consideration of HTC Corporation and HTC America, Inc.’s unopposed motion for leave to intervene, IT ls ORD1»:RE1) THAT:

APPLE V. ITC 2 The motion for leave to intervene is granted The re- vised ofEcia1 caption is reflected above. FoR THE CoURT JAN 1 0 2012 /s/ J an Horba1y Date Jan Horba1y Clerk cc: Marcus E. Sernel, Esq. Sidney A. RosenzWeig, Esq. Robert A. Van Nest, Esq. F|LE[) U.S. CUURT 0F APFEALS FOR 552 1 THE FEDEHAL ClRCUlT JAN 10 2012 JAN HOFlBALV - Cl.ERK

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NOTE: ThiS order is nonprecedential United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit APPLE INC., Appellcmt, v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee, ' _ AND HTC CORPORATION AND HTC AMERICA,` INC., In,teruenors. ‘ 2012-1125 0n appeal from the United States Internationa1Trade Comn:1ission in Investigation No. 337-TA-710. ON MOTION ORDER Upon consideration of HTC Corporation and HTC America, Inc.’s unopposed motion for leave to intervene, IT ls ORD1»:RE1) THAT:

APPLE V. ITC 2 The motion for leave to intervene is granted The re- vised ofEcia1 caption is reflected above. FoR THE CoURT JAN 1 0 2012 /s/ J an Horba1y Date Jan Horba1y Clerk cc: Marcus E. Sernel, Esq. Sidney A. RosenzWeig, Esq. Robert A. Van Nest, Esq. F|LE[) U.S. CUURT 0F APFEALS FOR 552 1 THE FEDEHAL ClRCUlT JAN 10 2012 JAN HOFlBALV - Cl.ERK

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Apple Inc. v. International Trade Commission, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/apple-inc-v-international-trade-commission-cafc-2012.