Appitito v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Appitito v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary

162 A.2d 285, 223 Md. 659, 1960 Md. LEXIS 558

Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided July 5, 1960·No. App. No. 9·Published

Opinion

PER Curiam.

The application herein of Ernest William Appitito for relief under the Post Conviction Procedure Act is substantially the same as that of his co-defendant, Raymond C. Fleury, whose application for leave to appeal from the denial of relief under that Act was denied by this Court on May 20, 1960 (222 Md. 635, 160 A. 2d 790).

For the reasons stated and upon the findings made by Judge Sodaro in his opinion in the Criminal Court of Baltimore, the application of Ernest William Appitito for leave to appeal from the order denying him relief under that Act and dismissing his petition therefor is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER Curiam.

The application herein of Ernest William Appitito for relief under the Post Conviction Procedure Act is substantially the same as that of his co-defendant, Raymond C. Fleury, whose application for leave to appeal from the denial of relief under that Act was denied by this Court on May 20, 1960 (222 Md. 635, 160 A. 2d 790).

For the reasons stated and upon the findings made by Judge Sodaro in his opinion in the Criminal Court of Baltimore, the application of Ernest William Appitito for leave to appeal from the order denying him relief under that Act and dismissing his petition therefor is denied.

Appitito v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary, 162 A.2d 285, 223 Md. 659, 1960 Md. LEXIS 558 (Md. 1960).

Pincite

162 A.2d 285 (Appitito v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related