Appitito v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary
This text of 162 A.2d 285 (Appitito v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The application herein of Ernest William Appitito for relief under the Post Conviction Procedure Act is substantially the same as that of his co-defendant, Raymond C. Fleury, whose application for leave to appeal from the denial of relief under that Act was denied by this Court on May 20, 1960 (222 Md. 635, 160 A. 2d 790).
For the reasons stated and upon the findings made by Judge Sodaro in his opinion in the Criminal Court of Baltimore, the application of Ernest William Appitito for leave to appeal from the order denying him relief under that Act and dismissing his petition therefor is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
162 A.2d 285, 223 Md. 659, 1960 Md. LEXIS 558, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/appitito-v-warden-of-maryland-penitentiary-md-1960.