Appenzellar v. Conrad
99 A. 31, 29 Del. 225, 6 Boyce 225, 1916 Del. LEXIS 30
This text of 99 A. 31 (Appenzellar v. Conrad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Appenzellar v. Conrad, 99 A. 31, 29 Del. 225, 6 Boyce 225, 1916 Del. LEXIS 30 (Del. 1916).
Opinion
Upon the authority of the case of Clendaniel v. Conrad, et al, 3 Boyce 549, the writ of prohibition prayed for is denied, the rule discharged, the petition dismissed, and the petitioner below ordered to pay costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Clendaniel v. Conrad
83 A. 1036 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1912)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
99 A. 31, 29 Del. 225, 6 Boyce 225, 1916 Del. LEXIS 30, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/appenzellar-v-conrad-del-1916.