Appelt v. Sprott

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Appelt v. Sprott

163 S.E. 831, 165 S.C. 372, 1932 S.C. LEXIS 91

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedApril 22, 1932

Docket13390

StatusPublished

This text of 163 S.E. 831 (Appelt v. Sprott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Appelt v. Sprott, 163 S.E. 831, 165 S.C. 372, 1932 S.C. LEXIS 91 (S.C. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Chile Justice BeEase.

The report of the Special Referee, George D. Levy, Esq., and the decree of the Circuit Judge, Honorable T. S. Sease, both of which will be reported, state fully the facts and legal issues involved in this cause, one in equity. After a careful examination of the entire record, we are unable to sustain any of the exceptions of the appellants. Accordingly, our judgment is that the decree appealed from be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

Messrs. Justices Stabler and Bonham concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Chile Justice BeEase.

The report of the Special Referee, George D. Levy, Esq., and the decree of the Circuit Judge, Honorable T. S. Sease, both of which will be reported, state fully the facts and legal issues involved in this cause, one in equity. After a careful examination of the entire record, we are unable to sustain any of the exceptions of the appellants. Accordingly, our judgment is that the decree appealed from be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.

Messrs. Justices Stabler and Bonham concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

163 S.E. 831, 165 S.C. 372, 1932 S.C. LEXIS 91, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/appelt-v-sprott-sc-1932.