Appelgren v. Spirit Airlines, Inc.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 0:24-cv-61200-LEIBOWITZ/AUGUSTIN-BIRCH
MARK APPELGREN, Plaintiff,
SPIRIT AIRLINES, INC., Defendant. a
ORDER THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 8], filed on August 9, 2024. In lieu of responding to the Motion, Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint [ECF No. 10]. Because the Amended Complaint supersedes the initial complaint, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is moot. See Dresdner Bank AG, Dresdner Bank AG in Hamburg v. M/V OLYMPLA VOYAGER, 463 F.3d 1210, 1215 (11th Cir. 2006); Johnson Controls, Inc. v. Uribaxo, 2012 WL 6652934, at *1 n.1 (S.D. Fla. Dec. 21, 2012). Accordingly, it 1s hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 8] is DENIED AS MOOT without prejudice. DONE AND ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on August 20, 2024. DAVID S. LEIBOWITZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
cc: counsel of record
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Appelgren v. Spirit Airlines, Inc. (Appelgren v. Spirit Airlines, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.