Appeal of Wigwam Amusement Co.

1 B.T.A. 335
United States Board of Tax Appeals·Decided January 16, 1925·No. Docket No. 180·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

[336] DECISION.

On authority of the Appeal of the First National Bank of Evanston, Wyo., 1 B. T. A. 9, it is held that the $30,000 representing the imextinguished cost of the building purchased by this taxpayer in 1906, which was demolished and discarded in 1912 and replaced by a new building, was a proper deduction as a loss in that year. The depreciated value of the building demolished being a deductible loss for 1912, can not be added to the amount expended in the construction of a new building in 1913 and included in invested capital of the corporation for 1917 and subsequent years, during the term of the new lease, in computing the profits taxes imposed for 1917 and subsequent years.

[337] The evidence does not justify an allowance for depreciation and obsolescence on the building constructed in 1918 in an amount greater than that determined by the Commissioner.

The deficiency determined by the Commissioner is approved.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal of Wigwam Amusement Co., 1 B.T.A. 335 (bta 1925).

1 B.T.A. 335 (Appeal of Wigwam Amusement Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mandel Bros. v. Commissioner
4 B.T.A. 341 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1926)
Waddell Coal Co. v. Commissioner
3 B.T.A. 160 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1925)
Wigwam Amusement Co. v. Commissioner
1 B.T.A. 335 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1925)