Appeal of Troost Avenue Cemetery Ass'n

4 B.T.A. 1169
CourtUnited States Board of Tax Appeals
DecidedSeptember 29, 1926
DocketDocket No. 1114
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 4 B.T.A. 1169 (Appeal of Troost Avenue Cemetery Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Board of Tax Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Appeal of Troost Avenue Cemetery Ass'n, 4 B.T.A. 1169 (bta 1926).

Opinion

[1171]*1171OPINION.

SteRnhagen :

The Commissioner has disallowed the deduction of the aforesaid amounts of $4,116.33 for 1920, $5,801.93 for 1921, and $6,537.61 for 1922, “ inasmuch as such fund constitutes a reserve to provide for the future expenses of the corporation.” In this we think he was in error. The deposit with the trustee was a present outlay pursuant to an obligation incurred in carrying on its business and forever beyond the recovery or control of the petitioner. The trust was expressly established and, unlike the Appeal of Springdale Cemetery Assn., 3 B. T. A. 223, the commitment was completé and the fund was irrevocably in the possession of another. We think that the full amount received by petitioner from the purchasers of lots was gross income and the percentage of the gross amount paid to the trustee under the trust agreement was deductible as an ordinary and necessary expense. The interest received by the trustee is clearly gross income of the trust and not of the Cemetery Company, which neither received it nor benefited by it.

Judgment for the 'petitioner.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Troost Ave. Cemetery Ass'n. v. Commissioner
4 B.T.A. 1169 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 B.T.A. 1169, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/appeal-of-troost-avenue-cemetery-assn-bta-1926.